This article is written by SHRUTI JAIN, LL.B 1stYear student of State Level PG Law College, Bhopal during her internship with LeDroit India.
INTRODUCTION
The number one step in any crook case is taking cognizance of the offence. By taking cognizance it is supposed to take judicial notice of an offence. Only after taking the cognizance of offences, the judiciary comes into picture. If we practice the dictionary which means it virtually refers to turning into conscious or getting the understanding of one of these offences. This changed into additionally enunciated with the aid of using the apex courtroom docket, withinside the case of R.R.Chari v. State of U.P had been it described it because the utility of judicial thoughts. Section one hundred ninety- 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 describe the techniques with the aid of using which, and the constraints situation to which, diverse crook courts are entitled to take attention of offences.
As in keeping with black regulation dictionary “Cognizance” –
- A courtroom docket’s proper and electricity to attempt to to decide instances; JURISDICTION.
- The taking of judicial or authoritative be aware.
- Acknowledgment or admission of an alleged fact; esp. (hist), acknowledgment of fine
The phrase “attention” has no esoteric or mystic importance in crook regulation or system. It simply way “turn out to be privy to” and while used with regards to a courtroom docket or choose, “to take word judicially” Ajit Kumar Palit v. State of W.B., (AIR 1963 SC 765).
TAKING OF COGNIZANCE
Meaning of what is “taking consciousness” has now no longer been described withinside the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it could be stated that any Magistrate who has taken attention beneath Sec. a hundred ninety (1) (a), Cr. P.C., he have to now no longer most effective have implemented his thoughts to the contents of the petition, however he have to have completed so for the motive of intending in a selected manner as indicated withinside the next provision i.e., complaints beneath Section 2 hundred, and thereafter sending it for inquiry and record beneath Section 202. It may be stated that earlier than a Magistrate takes awareness of an offence, he need to have implemented his thoughts for the reason of intending in a specific manner as indicated withinside the next provision. When a Magistrate applies his thoughts now no longer for the cause of intending below the following sections however for taking motion of a few different kind, e.g., ordering an research beneath.
MAGISTRATE NOT BOUND BY OPINION OF INVESTIGATING OFFICER
One of the guides open to the Magistrate is that as opposed to exercise his discretion and taking awareness of a cognizable offence and following the technique laid down beneath Section two hundred or Section 202 of the Code, he might also additionally order an research to be made with the aid of using the police beneath Section 156(three) of the Code, which the discovered Magistrate did withinside the on the spontaneous case. When such an order is made, the police is obliged to research the case and put up a file beneath Section 173 (2) of the Code. On receiving the police record, if the Magistrate is glad that at the information found or unearthed with the aid of using the police there’s enough cloth for him to take awareness of the offence, he may also take consciousness of the offence beneath Section one hundred ninety (l)(b) of the Code and trouble system straightway to the accused. However, Section one hundred ninety (l) (b) of the Code does now no longer lay down that a Magistrate can take awareness of an offence simplest if the investigating officer offers an opinion that the research makes out a case towards
The vital judgment of Hon‘ble Supreme Court in this subject matter is S.K. Sinha, Chief Enforcement officer vs Videocon International Ltd. &Ors, 2008 (61) ACC 371 SC. Since the Hon’ble Apex Court has mentioned numerous case legal guidelines withinside the aforesaid judgment, hence, it will likely be suitable to breed the applicable a part of the judgment, herein under
- Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, any Magistrate of the primary magnificence, and any Magistrate of the second one elegance mainly empowered on this behalf below sub-segment
- can also additionally take consciousness of any offence
- Upon receiving a criticism of information which represent such offence
- upon a police file of such records.
- upon statistics obtained from any individual apart from a police officer, or upon his personal understanding, that such offence has been devoted.
ISSUE OF MANNER
(1) If withinside the opinion of a Magistrate taking focus of an offence there’s enough floor for intending, and the case seems to be
- A summons-case, he shall problem his summons for the attendance of the accused, or
- A warrant-case, he may also trouble a warrant, or, if he thinks match, a summons, for inflicting the accused to be introduced or to seem at a sure time earlier than such Magistrate or (if he has no jurisdiction himself) a few different Magistrate having jurisdiction.
(2) No summons or warrant will be issued towards the accused beneathneath sub- segment (1) till a listing of the prosecution witnesses has been filed.
(3) In a intending instituted upon a criticism made in writing, each summons or warrant issued beneath sub- segment (1) will be followed via way of means of a replica of such grievance.
In DevarapalliLakshminarayana Reddy &Ors. V. V. Narayana Reddy &Ors., (1976)Three SCC 252, Court Verdict, “It is nicely settled that once a Magistrate gets a criticism, he isn’t always certain to take awareness if the records alleged withinside the criticism, divulge the fee of an offence. This is obvious from the usage of the phrases “might also additionally take attention” which withinside the context wherein they arise can not be equated with should take attention”. The phrase “can also additionally” offers discretion to the Magistrate withinside the remember. If on a studying of the grievance he reveals that the allegations therein expose a cognizable offence and the forwarding of the grievance to the police for research beneath Section 156(three) could be conducive to justice and shop the precious time of the Magistrate from, being wasted in enquiring right into a count which become basically the responsibility of the police to research, he can be justified in adopting that path as an opportunity to taking focus of the offence, himself.
COGNISANCE TAKEN BY A MAGISTRATE NOT EMPOWERED
If any Justice of the Peace now no longer empowered to take attention of an offense beneath S. one hundred ninety(1)(a) and a hundred ninety(1)(b), does erroneously in proper religion take awareness of an offense, his intending shall now no longer be set apart simply at the floor of his now no longer being empowered.
Purshottam Jethanand v. State of Kutch [9]: If a Justice of the Peace takes awareness of an offense and proceeds with an ordeal even though he isn’t empowered in that behalf and convicts the accused, the accused can’t avail himself of the disorder and can’t call for that his conviction be set apart simply at the floor of such irregularity, except there’s some thing at the report to reveal that the Justice of the Peace had assumed the energy, now no longer erroneously and in precise religion, however purposely having expertise that he did now no longer have this sort of strength. On the opposite hand, if a Justice of the Peace who isn’t always empowered to take awareness of an offense takes consciousness upon records acquired or upon his very own understanding beneath. A hundred ninety(1) his intending will be void and of no effect. In this type of case it’s far immaterial whether or not he become performing erroneously in right religion or otherwise.
COGNISANCE OF OFFENCES BY COURT OF SESSION
No courtroom docket of consultation shall take awareness of any offense as a courtroom docket of authentic jurisdiction until the case has been dedicated to it through a Justice of the Peace beneath S. 193 of the Code. When an offense is solely triable through a courtroom docket of consultation consistent with S.26 examine with the First Schedule the Magistrate taking consciousness of such offence is needed to devote the case for trial to the Court of Session after finishing sure initial formality. Sometimes the posts of CJM and ADJ are held with the aid of using one individual. In this type of case the CJM turned into required to take attention and attempt financial offenses. It turned into dominated that S. 193did now no longer practice to that case. For right distribution of the paintings withinside the courtroom docket of consultation and for administrative convenience, it’s been supplied that an Additional Session Judge or Assistant Session Judge shall strive such instances because the Sessions Judge of the department might also additionally, via way of means of preferred or unique order, make over to him for trial or because the High Court might also additionally, via way of means of unique order, direct him to strive below S.194 of the Code.
But it’s far very critical to factor out at this juncture that when the case is devoted to the Sessions Court beneath Section 209 Cr.P.C, the embargo engrafted in Section 193 Cr.P.C is lifted and the Sessions Court assumes all jurisdictions that are vested with the courtroom docket of Original jurisdiction along with the strength to summon such different co-accused humans who’ve now no longer been charge-sheeted via way of means of the investigating officer. Reliance on this regard is located upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kishun Singh v. State of Punjab, (1993) 2 SCC 16, the applicable extract of that’s reproduced herein under for the sort attention of this Hon’ble Court:
CONCLUSION
The expression “to take awareness” has now no longer been described withinside the code, nor does the code prescribed any unique shape of taking attention. The phrase “consciousness” is however, used withinside the code to suggest the factor while the Justice of the Peace or decide takes judicial be aware of an offence. It is a phrase of endless import and is possibly now no longer usually utilized in precisely the equal sense. The expression ‘consciousness’ simply manner ‘turn out to be privy to’ and while used with the reverence to a courtroom docket or choose, it connotes ‘to take note judicially’. It suggests the factor while the courtroom docket or a Justice of the Peace takes judicial note of an offence with the intention to factor provoke intending in appreciate of such offence stated to were devoted through someone. Taking consciousness” way consciousness of an offence and now no longer of an culprit. Once the Justice of the Peace takes awareness of an offence. It is the obligation to discover who the wrongdoer absolutely is and as soon as he involves the realization that aside from the character dispatched up through the police a few different character is worried, it’s far his obligation to continue towards the ones people. Thus, it’s miles unlucky to mention that, the Magistrates, who’ve been time and again recommended and guided via way of means of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to exercising extremely good warning in taking recognition, have failed in adhering to such guidance, due to which, the immersion of civil disputes with crook prices is immensely developing with every passing day as contemplated withinside the facts provided earlier than the subordinate courts of India. Day in and day out, masses of such lawsuits had been entertained with the aid of using a number of the Magistrates and awareness is taken. Humanly, it’s far not possible if there’s right software of thoughts. To conclude, as remarked with the aid of using the Supreme Court, there’s no unique attraction or any magical components withinside the expression ‘taking focus’ which simply approach judicial utility of the thoughts of the Magistrate to the information referred to withinside the criticism as a way to take in addition judicial movement.
To get your articles published send us your articles at info.ledroitindia@gmail.com.
Join our WhatsApp Group for daily Job & Internship updates:
CLICK HERE TO JOIN
