Paid Legal Internship Opportunity – Geminid Systems
paid legal internship opportunity
Legal Internship Opportunity at ICP – Paid (INR 20,000/month)
Paid Legal Internship Opportunity
Long-Term Legal Internship at Saarlegal
Location: Gurgaon (In-Person Only)Apply by: 25th July 2025Send your CV to: info@saarlegal.comSaarlegal is looking to onboard two long-term legal interns to join their office in Gurgaon. This opportunity is ideal for law students or recent graduates interested in gaining hands-on...
Federalism in Crisis – Analyzing the Delhi v Centre Power Tussle Post-Verdict
(This article is written by Anjali Kumari, BA.LLB, 4th Year, Marwadi University during her internship at LeDroit India)KeywordsFederalism, Centre-State Relations, Delhi Government, Lieutenant Governor, Supreme Court Verdict, Constitutional CrisisAbstractThe Indian Constitution lays the foundation for a federal structure where the...
GITHA HARIHARAN V. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (1999) CASE LAW
Author- Tanusri SantraCitation : (1999) 2 SCC 228Date: 18 February 1999Court Name: Supreme Court of IndiaPlaintiff/appellant/petitioner: Githa Hariharan and anotherDefendant/respondent: Reserve Bank of India and anotherJudges: S. Saghir Ahmad, J and Sujata V. Manohar, J.FACTS OF THE CASE ISSUES OF THE...
How men faced legal challenges for seeking maintenance and alimony in India?
Author- Huzaifa AnsarAbstractIn India, the legal framework surrounding maintenance and alimony has traditionally focused on protecting women, often overlooking the financial vulnerabilities faced by men. While laws like Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and personal laws provide for...
CASE ANALYSIS: SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY v. UNION OF INDIA, (2016) 7 SCC 221
Author- Neha ParveenCITATION(2016) 7 SCC 221, AIR 2016 SC 2728DATEMay 13, 2016COURT NAMEThe Supreme Court of IndiaPLAINTIFF/APPELANT/PETITIONERDr. Subramanian SwamyDEFENDANT/RESPONDENTUnion of India, Ministry of Law & Ors.JUDGESHon’ble Justice Dipak Misra & Hon’ble Justice Prafulla C. PantINTRODUCTION In the seminal case of Subramanian Swamy v. Union, the constitutionality of criminal defamation under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code was examined. Prominent politicians Rahul Gandhi, Arvind Kejriwal, and Dr. Subramanian Swamy were among the petitioners who contested these clauses, claiming that they violated the basic right to freedom of speech and expression protected by Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case has been crucial in defining the limits of free speech and the right to reputation in Indian law. The Supreme Court changed the ratio of the right to reputation under Article 21 to the freedom of expression while maintaining the legitimacy of criminal defamation. FACTS OF THE CASEISSUES OF...
Trademark squatting in India: Recent cases and preventive strategies
Author- Anuranjani Kumari Abstract Trademark squatting is a growing concern around the world. This happens when individuals or entities register trademarks without any genuine intention to use them, often to exploit the brand’s reputation. In India, as the economy continues to...
Contract Support Assistant (Legal)
Location: Mumbai & GurugramCompany: GartnerExperience Range: 0 to 2 yearsMode: HybridJob descriptionAbout this role:Provide administrative and professional support to internal clients through the timely processing of Contracts Management, Pricing and Deal Hub administrative functions.What youll do:What you’ll need:Who you are:
Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 272 Date: 26th March, 2021
This case analysis is written by Vasundhara Sinha during her internship with Le Droit India.Bench: Division Bench of the Supreme Court Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, A.S. Bopanna, S.A. Bobde Background: CPM, from minority shareholder SP Group, was appointed Executive Chairman of Tata Sons....
