Appointment and Function of a Commission

This article is written by Arif Hussain, Swat University, Final-Year Law Student, during  his internship at LeDroit India.

Keywords

Commission, Appointment, Functions, Legal framework, Constitutional provisions,  Inquiry

Abstract

The role of commissions in governance and the legal system is indispensable for addressing  public grievances ensuring accountability and upholding justice. Commissions are often  created under constitutional or statutory provisions such as the Commissions of Inquiry  Act 1952 or through judicial orders. Their functions vary from conducting investigations  to making policy recommendations. This article discusses the appointment processes

functions and challenges of commissions with references to key judgments and statutory  provisions.

Introduction

Commissions act as independent or quasi-judicial bodies created to address specific  problems that require in-depth investigation or expertise. Their functions are vital for  maintaining public trust and upholding constitutional principles. Constitutional bodies like  the Election Commission of India (ECI) and statutory commissions such as the National

Human Rights Commission (NHRC) play essential roles in ensuring governance and  transparency.

Governments across the world have utilized commissions to investigate critical issues such  as corruption violations of human rights and public service grievances. In India the  constitutional and legislative framework for commissions is robust making them one of the  most effective tools for inquiry and administration.

Appointment of a Commission

The appointment process depends on the type and purpose of the commission.  Commissions may be constitutional statutory or ad hoc in nature.

1. Constitutional Commissions

• Articles such as Article 324 (Election Commission) and Article 315 (Public Service  Commission) of the Indian Constitution lay down provisions for the appointment of  commissions.

• Members of constitutional commissions are appointed by the President or the  Governor depending on their jurisdiction.

• Example: The Finance Commission constituted under Article 280 advises on the  distribution of financial resources between the center and states.

2. Statutory Commissions

• These commissions are constituted under specific legislative acts. The Commissions  of Inquiry Act 1952 empowers governments to create commissions to address  matters of public importance.

• Example: The Liberhan Commission established under the Commissions of Inquiry  Act investigated the Babri Masjid demolition.

3. Ad Hoc Commissions

• Ad hoc commissions are set up for specific purposes such as investigating public  grievances or allegations of corruption.

• Judicial orders may also mandate the creation of commissions. For instance in  Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan guidelines for workplace harassment committees  were introduced.

Functions of a Commission

Commissions perform diverse roles depending on their mandate. Their primary functions  include:

1. Investigative Role

Commissions conduct inquiries into matters requiring impartial and expert investigation.  Examples include:

• The Shah Commission (1977) investigated abuses during the Emergency in India. • The Liberhan Commission examined the events surrounding the Babri Masjid  demolition.

2. Advisory Role

Statutory and constitutional commissions often act as advisory bodies. For example: • The Law Commission of India recommends legal reforms to ensure the justice  system remains efficient and relevant.

• The Finance Commission advises on the distribution of financial resources. 3. Administrative Role

Commissions like the Election Commission of India play an administrative role by  overseeing free and fair elections.

4. Quasi Judicial Role

Certain commissions have quasi-judicial powers such as summoning witnesses and  examining evidence. For instance:

• The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) investigates human rights  violations and provides remedies to victims.

Illustrations and Examples

Landmark Case Law:

Election Commission of India vs Subramaniam Swamy (1996) The Supreme Court emphasized the independence of the Election Commission,  ensuring free and fair elections as a cornerstone of democracy.

Recent Case Law:

Aruna Roy vs Union of India (2002)

The court acknowledged the role of commissions in shaping education policy in  line with constitutional principles.

Illustration (IPC):

• Section 197 of the IPC provides for inquiries into allegations of corruption against  government officials often requiring the establishment of commissions.

Challenges in the Functioning of Commissions

Despite their importance commissions face several challenges:

Delays: Many commissions take years to submit reports reducing their relevance  and impact.

Limited Powers: Recommendations made by commissions are often non-binding,  leading to inaction.

Political Interference: The independence of commissions is sometimes  compromised due to political pressures.

Resource Constraints: Lack of adequate funding and manpower affects their  efficiency.

Conclusion

Commissions are indispensable for maintaining governance and justice in a democratic  system. Their investigative advisory and quasi-judicial functions enable them to address  grievances and suggest reforms effectively. However challenges such as delays lack of  enforcement powers and political interference must be addressed through structural  reforms. Strengthening commissions can ensure their relevance and efficiency in  addressing issues of public concern.

References

Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 Link

Election Commission of India v. Subramaniam Swamy, 1996 Link

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan, 1997 Link Shah Commission Report, 1977

Related Posts
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked *