(ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD V. UNION OF INDIA)
ABSTRACT:
Jallikattu, a traditional bull-taming sport performed in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, has generated debate for a number of years. The sport, which has ancient roots, involves competitors trying to control and hold on to a charging bull. However, issues with the handling and welfare of the animals used in the sport have been brought up.
This article explores the legal conflict between the Union of India and the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), emphasizing the legality of Jallikattu and its effects on animal welfare. This article seeks to provide a thorough overview of the continuing discussion surrounding Jallikattu and its adherence to animal welfare standards by examining the arguments put forth by both parties and the court’s rulings.
Keywords: Jallikattu, Animal Welfare, Heritage Culture, Court Decisions, AWBI (Animal Welfare Board of India)
INTRODUCTION:
Jallikattu, also known as ‘eruthazhuvuthal,’ holds cultural and historical significance in Tamil Nadu, where it is celebrated as part of the Pongal festival. However, concerns about animal welfare have led to debates over the legality and ethics of this sport. The article begins by introducing the background and significance of Jallikattu, outlining the opposing viewpoints, and emphasizing the importance of addressing animal welfare concerns while preserving cultural traditions.
THE ANIMAL WELFARE BOARDS PERSPECTIVE:
The Animal Welfare Board of India, a statutory body under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, has been at the forefront of challenging the practice of Jallikattu. This section examines the arguments put forth by the AWBI, which primarily revolve around animal cruelty, safety concerns for participants and spectators, and non-compliance with existing animal welfare laws. The article delves into the legal provisions and scientific evidence cited by the AWBI to substantiate their claims.
THE UNION OF INDIA’S DEFENSE:
The Union of India claims that Jallikattu is a crucial component of their cultural legacy and pushes for its preservation on behalf of the state of Tamil Nadu. The Union’s arguments, which emphasize the sport’s historical importance, economic advantages, and the conviction that Jallikattu does not constitute cruelty if properly governed, are examined in this section. In order to support the continued use of Jallikattu, the Union of India has cited certain constitutional and cultural factors in the article.
LEGAL BATTLE AND COURT DECISIONS:
This section provides an overview of the legal battle between the AWBI and the Union of India, including the series of court judgments that have shaped the discourse on Jallikattu. The article analyzes the Supreme Court’s rulings, focusing on the 2014 ban on Jallikattu and subsequent modifications to the legislation. It also highlights the implications of these decisions on animal welfare regulations and the overall debate surrounding cultural practices versus animal rights.
BALANCING ANIMAL WELFARE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE:
The final section discusses the challenges and potential solutions in reconciling the conflicting interests of animal welfare and cultural heritage. It explores the need for a nuanced approach that acknowledges the importance of cultural traditions while ensuring the well-being of the animals involved. The article concludes by providing recommendations for striking a balance between preserving cultural practices and implementing safeguards to protect animal welfare.
CONCLUSION:
The issue over Jallikattu is representative of larger ethical discussions about customs and animal welfare. This article analyses the court rulings that have formed the legal foundation for Jallikattu and looks at the contrasting views put forth by the Union of India and the Animal Welfare Board of India. This article seeks to add to the continuing discussion and aid in locating a middle ground that upholds tradition while placing an emphasis on animal welfare by taking into account both cultural heritage and animal welfare issues.
REFERENCES:
This article is writen by Garima Tiwari,: Amity University Lucknow,3rd year,LLB during her internship.
